Most guides say run Sponsored Products first and Sponsored Brands later. On my own account I spend more on SB — and it reports a lower ACoS. The catch: you can't read SB's numbers like SP's, and it only works cleanly if you own your buy box.
Most Amazon PPC guides tell you the same thing: run Sponsored Products first, and treat Sponsored Brands as something you graduate into later, once you're spending real money. I followed that advice for my first couple of years selling. Then I looked at my own account.
On Rowdy Rooster Woodworks, I now spend more on Sponsored Brands than on Sponsored Products — and over the last 90 days, Sponsored Brands has been the more efficient of the two. That's the opposite of the standard order. Here's what I've actually learned about when each one earns its place.
What each one actually is
Sponsored Products (SP) are the direct-response workhorse. A shopper searches "cutting board wax," your product shows in the results, they click, they land on that page. One product, one click, one clean line from spend to order. It's the easiest campaign type to trust because the feedback loop is tight — every dollar traces back to a keyword and an ACoS.
Sponsored Brands (SB) are a brand owner's tool. Your logo, a headline you write, and up to three products across the top of search, linking to your Brand Store or a listing. It isn't selling one product — it's putting your brand in front of a shopper at the top of the page, cheaply, and moving them toward your catalog. You have to be brand-registered to run it.
Why Sponsored Brands earns its budget on my account
Once I stopped treating SB as the junior partner, here's what I found. It gets attention cheaply. It moves people to my sales pages. And it builds awareness that pays off later — a shopper who sees the Rowdy Rooster banner today recognizes it tomorrow.
On the numbers, over the last 90 days my Sponsored Brands reported a lower ACoS than my Sponsored Products — roughly 34% versus 36% — at a nearly identical cost per click, and it drove more orders. But that doesn't automatically mean SB is the better campaign type. Attribution is different, and that difference matters more than the headline number. I run SB because it works for my brand — not because a guide told me to. (I run zero Sponsored Display myself, for what it's worth; SP and SB do the job for my catalog. RedHen Labs manages Display all the same — it syncs and reports it alongside SP and SB, and its own engine proposes Display bid changes for you to approve.)
The catch nobody mentions: you can't read SB's ACoS like SP's
Here's the part that keeps me honest. I don't trust that lower SB number the way I trust an SP number, and neither should you.
Two reasons. First, SB sits higher up the funnel, so it gets credit for sales that might have happened anyway — the shopper who sees your banner, then buys through your organic listing or your SP ad an hour later. SB can receive credit for a conversion it influenced rather than uniquely created. That flatters its reported ACoS.
Second — the one most articles never say out loud: Sponsored Brands is fantastic if you're the only one selling on your brand, and risky if you're not. SB drives attention to your brand and your listings. If you own your buy box, that attention becomes your sale. But if other sellers share your listings, your ad spend can send a shopper to a page where someone else wins the buy box. You paid for the click; a competitor booked the order. I run SB confidently because Rowdy Rooster is my brand and I control my listings. A reseller — or anyone who doesn't own their buy box — should think hard before pouring money into SB.
That's why I don't manage SB on ACoS alone. I watch what the whole business does — TACoS and real profit over time — because SB's job is partly to lift the entire brand, and one campaign's ACoS can't see that.
The cannibalization question, honestly
There's a fair worry that SP and SB compete with each other. In a tight niche, you can end up with your SB banner at the very top of a search and your own SP ad in the results right below it. A curious shopper clicks both — and you've paid for two clicks to move one person to the same page. I haven't found a reliable way to measure this conclusively on my own account. What I do is watch which placement actually converts: if the order comes from the SB banner, it earns the spend; if it's just an expensive lead-in to a click I'd have gotten from SP anyway, that's where I trim. Conversion is the tiebreaker, not gut feel.
So where should you start?
If you're new or small, start with Sponsored Products. Get the direct-response engine running, find your winning keywords, learn your real cost per order. You don't need a brand banner before you understand what a click is worth.
But don't wait for some magic monthly-spend milestone to try Sponsored Brands. The real gate isn't a dollar figure — it's three questions: Are you brand-registered? Do you own your buy box? Can you produce a video at a reasonable cost? If the answer is yes, every brand owner should be testing SB. A decent video ad at the top of search is cheap attention a single-product ad can't buy. Test it, measure it against your total profit, and let the results tell you how much it deserves.
How we handle both
This is why RedHen Labs shows Sponsored Products and Sponsored Brands side by side against total profitability — TACoS and real per-product profit — not just each campaign's ACoS in isolation. You set the rules for each campaign type, a human approves every change, and you can see how SP and SB actually work together on your bottom line instead of guessing. Try it free for 14 days.